Have you ever felt personally deceived by adverts…?

We all know that an advert aims to entice you to buy what they are promoting, but there is a fine line between making the item look desirable and misleading people. It seems that many retailers have forgotten.

I was inspired to write this piece after coming across this video while scrolling through my LinkedIn feed, as you do….

After watching this, I felt quite cheated. Now I’m not implying that I am going to walk past McDonald’s ad believing that my Big Mac is going to turn out like this…

BUT what really grinds my gears is when retailers take it to the extreme and plain-out lie about what a product/service offers, e.g. Activia released an ORDINARY yoghurt and claimed that it could prevent colds and flu by branding it with ‘clinically’ tested and ‘scientifically proven’ which was, yes you guessed it, a COMPLETE LIE. This then led to a lawsuit against Dannon which resulted in a $45 million pay-out and were ordered to remove “clinically” and “scientifically proven” from their labels.

Impact on society

We are in a society that is very heavily influenced by looks and material goods, so when brands decide to advertise a product unethically, they are creating an unrealistic image for people to aspire to.

In the UK alone, 16 million people are living with mental health problems, with depression being the leading global disability worldwide.Many people think that its very expensive to cure but they dint know that they can get loan ideas from cashshape.co.uk. In Jan 2018, it was reported that suicide is the biggest killer of young people age 20-34. This statistic saddens me, being 21 myself and experiencing all kinds of pressures from society – so I can see why depression is becoming so prominent in our daily lives.

In 2018, why do brands still think it is okay to deceive the public when they know the impact of promoting unrealistic expectations on society? What I can’t comprehend is how retailers don’t think implementing certain practices won’t be detrimental to their business.

Consumers DO NOT like to be conned. Speaking from personal experience, they will retaliate by voicing their opinions via word-of-mouth and social media or merely boycott the brand, which could ruin their reputation and business.

Deceptive advertising in action.

Nivea released My Silhouette – a body cream that if used regularly will ‘SIGNIFICANTLY’ reduce your body size.

If you ask me, what a load of rubbish!

One of their TV ads for the campaign displayed a woman getting dressed after having applied Nivea My Silhouette cream to her stomach and thighs. She rummages through the back of her wardrobe, tries on a pair of old jeans, and discovers that they now fit.

During the ad, the voice-over says;

“New Nivea My Silhouette with Bio-Slim Complex helps redefine the appearance of your silhouette and noticeably firm skin in just four weeks. So, you can rediscover your favourite jeans and how they still get his attention.’’

For one, since when do women wear clothes for men and two NO CREAM WOULD DO THIS?!

To cut a long story short, Nivea had to pay $900,000 in settlement fees for their misleading ads and had to stop producing the My Silhouette cream.

What I think is terrible is that they use women’s insecurities for their own financial benefit, which really doesn’t sit well with a lot of people.

In addition, Rimmel London fell under scrutiny AGAIN for portraying an unrealistic picture of the ‘volumising’ and ‘lengthening’ benefits of their Scandaleyes RELOADED mascara.

Makeup brands are always under pressure to stop excessively editing photos and using fake eyelashes. The Advertising Standards Authority made an example of Rimmel and banned Cara Delevingne’s ad campaign to remind the industry about the rules regarding artificially enhancing particular effects of products.

What I find annoying is that they didn’t exactly apologise, they merely admitted to ‘filling in the gaps’, creating a ‘uniform lash time’ and that post-production techniques were used to ‘re-draw’ some of the model’s lashes, as APPARENTLY, they weren’t visible due to Cara’s eyeshadow.

Now if you ask me if that much effort had to go into promoting their product, then maybe Rimmel need to go back to the drawing board as their mascara should create all of the desired effects without editing…

If you’re a retailer and think it’s a good idea to use this form of advertising, then consider the effect that misleading people has on a person, your employees and your reputation, as this will all be influenced by your decision to be ethical or not.